Supporting the Needs of All Learners


           Recent research has consistently shown that each student has a different learning style (Evans, Cools, & Charlesworth, 2010). Some learners achieve more when hearing the material, others achieve more when seeing an example, and others achieve more when they have the opportunity to handle the material.  Educators today are encouraged to find ways to meet the needs of all learners, and technology gives educators multitudes of different ways to adapt lessons to meet the needs of learners.  This paper will discuss and support this author’s understanding of the importance of designing to support the needs of all learners and will then redesign a prior MATLT activity to demonstrate attainment of Program Learning Outcome 3 to “design learning opportunities that apply technology-enhanced instructional strategies to support the needs of all learners.”

Importance of Addressing Different Learning Styles

            Over time, educators have come to the realization that each learner has a different style of learning.  Just as every person is different, so are the learning styles.  Some learners retain material best when they hear it, others when they see it, and others when they have the opportunity to practice it (Felder & Brent, 2005).  And still other learners do best when they have the material presented in multiple different formats.  Educators today are able to meet the needs of different learners by using technology.  Lessons can be created or modified to incorporate websites, presentation software, and learning resources.  By incorporating technology into a lesson, an educator is able to more easily present the information to the learners using different formats in an attempt to match the material presentation to the needs of the student (Hall, Strangman, & Meyere, 2003).

Original Lesson: EDU648

In this lesson, the students will demonstrate an understanding of the impact of commercial fishing on the seal population of the Alaskan Maritime National Wildlife Refuge.  A research report and discussion on the topic will determine if the lesson goals have been accomplished.  Before proceeding with the lesson, it is important to know what the students already know that will assist in learning this task.  A question and answer session can be conducted prior to the lesson about the topic to assess student understanding of the information.  It is important to determine what resources, facilities, and equipment are available and accessible.  This school has Smart boards in each classroom which can be used to show pictures of the fishermen in action and the seals that are affected.

            Before starting the lesson, the educator must decide what instructional material or activities should be included.  This lesson will include all relevant information about the activities of fishermen in the Alaskan Maritime National Wildlife Refuge and about seal life.  The information will be presented in lecture format with the Smart Board engaging learners by showing pictures of the seals at risk and showing examples of how the seals’ lives have changed as a result of fishing.  The most effective, efficient, and appealing manner this information can be acquired by the students is through the use of multiple teaching styles to appeal to the different learning styles.  The use of lecture appeals to learners who learn best through hearing the information, and the Smart Board will appeal to learners who learn best when seeing information.  A combination of both methods is likely to maximize the learning of all students because having the information presented in multiple ways increases the likelihood of retention (Lever-Duffy & McDonald, 2011).

            The learning activities should be ordered as they would occur in the wild. The lives of the seals before commercial fishing can be explained followed by a description of the commercial fishing industry and its desire for the fish in this refuge.  The information can then be presented about the impact of fishing on the seals.  Students can be assisted in learning this new information by having it presented in multiple formats to appeal to the learning styles of the different students (Evans, Cools, & Charlesworth, 2010). Visual learners will appreciate the Smart Board, and auditory learners will enjoy the lecture. 

Redesigned Lesson

            This lesson already addresses some of the needs of the auditory and visual learners because it incorporates lecture and Smart Board usage.  The lesson will be redesigned to better use technology to meet the needs of all students.  The Smart Board technology will be used to create and present a Prezi presentation that clearly goes over each animal and its characteristics.  Prezi is an versatile  program that works well with Smart Board technology, although an educator could use another program if he or she so desires. Pictures will be shown so that students understand the differences that exist between the animals.  It is also important in this lesson for students to gain a better understanding of the relationship between fishermen and the wildlife.  In order to teach this material and engage the kinesthetic learners, the instructor will create a virtual pond and have students practice “fishing” in the pond without harming the wildlife.  This virtual pond can be created using Smart Board programming, and students can come up to the board and take turns “fishing.” 

            Students will also be engaged in this lesson through the use of technology by being instructed to create a homework project of their choice.  They will be encouraged to use technology, but ultimately each student will be able to choose the method that they prefer to present their final project.  Students will be instructed to research the life cycles and relationships between the animals and humans and will present their learning.  Students can write a research paper, create a Power Point presentation or Prezi to show what they have learned.  They will also be encouraged to create dioramas or virtual pictorial presentations.  The use of lecture combined with Smart Board usage and Smart Board “play” along with the myriad of choices the students will have in presenting their final project will work to meet the learning needs of all students.

Challenges

            The biggest challenge in redesigning this project revolved around finding one more, different way to meet the needs of the different learners.  The lesson already incorporated lecture and Smart Board usage which appeals to auditory and visual learners.  So it was necessary to address the needs of the hands on or kinesthetic learners.  This was also a challenge because the material lends itself more to presentation or lecture format.  After much thought, it was recognized that the students could conduct a hands on analysis of the material by actually practicing “fishing” in order to see the interactions that occur between humans and animals and the animals with each other.

Conclusion

            Educators today can work to meet the needs of their different students by using technology to present information in auditory, visual and even kinesthetic ways.  Students who are given the opportunity to see material presented in different formats are going to be much more capable of understanding and retaining information.  The lesson above that was prepared for a previous class did address the needs of some learners but it was not completely thorough and received a revision that better met the needs of the kinesthetic learners.  A final project was added that allows every student to choose the type of project that best suits their learning style and desires.  This will ultimately increase student motivation and learning.

 

References

Hall, T., Strangman, N., & Meyer, A. (2003). Differentiated instruction and implications for UDL implementation. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General

Evans, C., Cools, E., & Charlesworth, Z.M.  (2010).  Learning in higher education – how cognitive and learning styles matter. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(4), 467-478.

Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57-72. Retrieved from http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Understanding_Differences.pdf.

No comments:

Post a Comment